And with this one, we go into what is, for me, brand new territory. The Leni Pökler flashback (more on that in a bit) is about where I lost the plot (pardon the pun) and ended up putting it down and reading something else to rest my brain a bit. And by the time I picked it back up, it was better to just start again from the beginning. So, I did! Hooray!
I think for me, sometimes I have the biggest part wrapping my head around the Psi Section bits — I’m pretty much Not Into That in real life, and while I know that a) This isn’t real and b) It’s a comment on how the Nazis DID use (or, rather “use”) Psi Section-type stuff, I think there’s still a little bit in my brain that rebels on it and doesn’t quite want to process it all the way. I believe I’m getting better on that, but I still need to smack myself around a little when it comes to that, at least as it pertains to Gravity’s Rainbow. Continue reading →
This is the first actual entry in the Gravity’s Rainbow discussion thing! If you’d like to read along, this is the edition that we’re reading — so if you’re reading another edition, the pagination might be slightly different. (As a guide, this one is 776 pages.) As of right now, the only two people who will be posting articles about the book will be me and Ben, although other people are welcome — just let me know — or, if you’d rather just discuss in the comments, that’s fine as well! I believe both Ben and I are set-up to be emailed when anyone leaves a comment, so we will see things and hopefully respond!
This’ll probably turn out where Ben’ll probably be a bit more academic, in-depth on the novel, since not only is he much farther in it than I am, he’s also going for his Ph.D in English; me, I’m just a guy who works in radio and reads too dang much. So, while he’s all talking about the use of synecdoche in Pynchon’s work and what it means for literature on the whole, I’ll be talking about how the Banana Breakfast sounds real good.